M/S Hi-Tech Food v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ….Respondent _____________________________________________________
High Court
21 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Hi-Tech Food v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ….Respondent _____________________________________________________
Date of order
21 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Hi-Tech Food v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ….Respondent _____________________________________________________, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgments passed in ITA No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITAs No. 19 and 20 of 2014Date of Decision : 21.7.2014.
_____________________________________________________
1. ITA No. 19/2014
M/s Hi-Tech Food
….Appellant ….Respondent
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax ….Respondent _____________________________________________________
2. ITA No. 20 of 2014
M/s Hi-Tech Food ….Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax ….Respondent
______________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
______________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice(oral
Learned Counsel for the respondent(s)
stated at the Bar that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 27.6.2013, delivered by this Court in ITA No. 4001 of 2013, titled as M/s Pooja Industries versus Commissioner of Income Tax read with the judgment dated 16.6.2014, passed by this Court in OMP (M) No. 12 of 2014 (ITA No. 21 of 2014), titled as M/s Hi-
Tech Food versus Commissioner of Income Tax. Her statement is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgments passed in ITA No. 4001 of 2013 and ITA No. 21 of 2014, supra, made part of the file.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir), Chief Justice
July 21, 2014 (hemlata)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue