M/S Honda Motorcycle And Scooterpertitionerindia Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Itax~~Respondentgurgaon & Anr
High Court
03 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Honda Motorcycle And Scooterpertitionerindia Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Itax~~Respondentgurgaon & Anr
Date of order
03 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Honda Motorcycle And Scooterpertitionerindia Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Itax~~Respondentgurgaon & Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
CWP? No.73585 of 201DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 3, 2018
M/S HONDA MOTORCYCLE AND SCOOTERPERTITIONERINDIA PVT. LTD., GURGAON
VERSUS
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ITAX~~RESPONDENTGURGAON & ANR.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL|HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
PRESENT: MR. DEEPAK AGRAWAL, ADVOCAT
FOR THER PEIITIONER
MR. I.K. JOSHI, ADVOCATEFOR THE RESPONDENTS|
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(QRAL)
The prayer made in this petition 1s to quash the order dated 20.3.2018
issued under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’)
D-Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the
writ petition, the order dated 20.3.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed under Section 263 ofthe Act, impugned in the writ petition, has been set aside by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi 'C' Bench, New Delhi vide order dated in 26.6.2018passed in ITA No.2330/DEL/2018.
3.A prayer 1s made by learned counsel for the petitioner that he may be
allowed to withdraw the present writ petition.
4Accordingly, the present writ petition 1s dismissed as withdrawn.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
August 3, 2018Gulati
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Whether ReportableYes/NoWhether Speaking/ReasonedYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.