M/S H.p. Board Of School Education v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S H.p. Board Of School Education v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S H.p. Board Of School Education v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn, so also, pending application(s), if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.3 of 2016
Date of decision: 11.05.2017
M/s H.P. Board of School Education
..Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax . Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr.Ajay Vaidya, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
________________________________________________________________________________
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that appellant be allowed to withdraw the present appeal, reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law, including filing an application for review/rectification, if permissible. Permission granted. Liberty reserved.
2. Appellant undertakes to file such application within a period of four weeks from today and till decision thereupon is taken by the appropriate Authority, we direct that our interim order dated 29[th] January, 2016, shall continue to remain in force. Petitioner further undertakes to fully cooperate and not to take unnecessary adjournments. The Authority shall decide the application expeditiously and
preferably within a period of three months thereafter. Needless to add, since petitioner had been pursuing remedies before this Court, limitation shall not come in the way of adjudication of such petition. Liberty reserved to approach the Court, if so required subsequently.
Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn, so also,
pending application(s), if any.
Copy dasti.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
May 11, 2017
(vt)
( Sandeep Sharma ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.