M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Delhi & Anr
High Court
03 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Delhi & Anr
Date of order
03 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act in respect of AY 2012-13 is set aside.4.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 15957/2023 & CM APPL. 64236/2023 (Stay)
M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kishore Kamal & Ms. Ankita Prakash, Advocates.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Indruj Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC & Mr. Anmol Jagga, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R03.12.2024
%
1.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter-alia, impugning a notice dated 31.03.2023, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act), in respect of the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. It is the petitioner’s case that the said notice is beyond the period of limitation. Concededly, the said controversy stands concluded in favour of the petitioner, in view of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ojjus Medicare Private Limited: 2024 SCC OnLine Del 4451.
2.In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press other reliefs, as sought for, in the present petition.
3.Accordingly, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act in respect of AY 2012-13 is set aside.4.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application is also disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 03, 2024/at
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.