Case LawHigh Court › M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd v. Joint C...

M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd v. Joint Commissioner Of Incometax Special Range 27 & Ors

High Court 28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd v. Joint Commissioner Of Incometax Special Range 27 & Ors
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd v. Joint Commissioner Of Incometax Special Range 27 & Ors, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Notice of motionis made absolute in terms of prayer cause (a).Pending Notice of Motion No.971 of 2003, taken outin the above appeal also stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1472 OF 2003 in INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.693 OF 2002in INCOMETAXAPPEAL (Reje) No.803 of 2002 M/s Indian Gum Industries Ltd .. Appellant Vs. Joint Commissioner of IncomeTax Special Range 27 & ors Ms.Aasifa Khan for AppellantMr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Respts CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATE : 28th April, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the respondents. 2. By this motion, the appellant is seekingsetting aside the order dated 17th April, 2003whereby the Prothonotary and Senior Master haddismissed the appeal for non-removal of officeobjections. 3. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. For the reasons stated in paras 2,3and 4 of the motion, sufficient cause is made outfor setting aside the aforesaid order of the learned Prothonotary and Senior Master. Theappeal stands restored to file. Notice of motionis made absolute in terms of prayer cause (a).Pending Notice of Motion No.971 of 2003, taken outin the above appeal also stands disposed of. Itis made clear that if the appellant fails toremove the office objections within two weeks fromtoday, earlier order of the learned Prothonotaryand Senior Master dated 17th April, 2003dismissing the appeal will stand revivedautomatically without further reference to theCourt. (A.V.Nirgude, J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan