M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
High Court
23 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
Date of order
23 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The reference is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITR No.91 of 1996
Date of decision: 23.7.2010
M/s Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura
-----Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present:-Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the assessee.
Adarsh Kumar Goel,J.
Following question of law has been referred for opinion ofthis Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench,arising out of its order dated 28.7.1995 in ITA No.636 of 1990, forassessment year 1988-89:-
“Whether, on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the ITAT was right in law in coming to theconclusion that the debt raised from the bank for thepurchase of plant and machinery which remainedunpaid during the accounting period, was not to betaken into account for purposes of allowing deductionunder section 32AB of the Income Tax Act to theassessee?”
Learned counsel for the assessee points out that the issuehas already been decided against the assessee by judgment of this Court
dated 20.9.2006 in Industrial Cables India Limited v. CIT, (2008)
304 ITR 272.
In view of above, the question referred is answered in
favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
The reference is disposed of accordingly.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
July 23, 2010‘gs’
(Alok Singh) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.