Case LawHigh Court › M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, R...

M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala

High Court 23 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
Date of order
23 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The reference is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. ITR No.91 of 1996 Date of decision: 23.7.2010 M/s Industrial Cables (India) Limited, Rajpura -----Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala ----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:-Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the assessee. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. Following question of law has been referred for opinion ofthis Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench,arising out of its order dated 28.7.1995 in ITA No.636 of 1990, forassessment year 1988-89:- “Whether, on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the ITAT was right in law in coming to theconclusion that the debt raised from the bank for thepurchase of plant and machinery which remainedunpaid during the accounting period, was not to betaken into account for purposes of allowing deductionunder section 32AB of the Income Tax Act to theassessee?” Learned counsel for the assessee points out that the issuehas already been decided against the assessee by judgment of this Court dated 20.9.2006 in Industrial Cables India Limited v. CIT, (2008) 304 ITR 272. In view of above, the question referred is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The reference is disposed of accordingly. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge July 23, 2010‘gs’ (Alok Singh) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan