M/S. J. Pattanaik And Associates, Advocates v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others

Order No. 01. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25288 of 2022 Maa Pahadwali Rice Mill, Boudh Petitioner …. M/s. J. Pattanaik and associates, Advocates -versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and others ….Opposite Parties Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel for IT Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER 31.10.2022 1. Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department enters appearance for the Opposite Parties and files his appearance memo in Court today, which is taken on record. 2. The real challenge in the present petition is to Annexure-6, which is an assessment order under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) dated 9[th]March, 2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. 3. Admittedly, the impugned order is an appealable order. 4. Consequently, permitting the Petitioner to avail of the remedy of an appeal against the said impugned order and reserving the right of the Petitioner to raise all pleas including the points urged in the present petition before the Appellate Authority in M. Panda accordance with law, this Court declines to interfere at this stage. 5. If the appeal is filed not later than 15[th] November, 2022 accompanied by an application for condonation of delay citing the pendency of the present petition as the reason for the delay, it will be considered in accordance with law by the Appellate Authority. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) (M. S. Raman) Chief Justice Judge