Case Law › High Court › M/S Jamnadas And Co. And Another v. Comm...

M/S Jamnadas And Co. And Another v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur

High Court 27 Jun 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

27 Jun 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Jamnadas And Co. And Another v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: None appears for the petitioners today also.The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 2143 of 2006 M/s Jamnadas and Co. and another. -vs- Commissioner of Income tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's Orders.or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, &A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 27th June, 2012. None appeared for the petitioners on 19.6.2012. None appears for the petitioners today also.The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE Hirekhan

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.