Case Law › High Court › M/S. Jaya Marketing v. Addl. Cit-12(3),...

M/S. Jaya Marketing v. Addl. Cit-12(3), Mumbai & Anr

High Court 31 Oct 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Oct 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Jaya Marketing v. Addl. Cit-12(3), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.In view of this statement, nothing survives in this appeal and the same is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2015 M/s. Jaya Marketing … Appellant vs. Addl. CIT-12(3), Mumbai & Anr … Respondents Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Appellant. Mr. P. C. Chhotaray for the Respondent. P. C. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.DATE : 31[st] OCTOBER, 2017 1.Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant pointed out that the impugned order has been recalled by the Appellate Tribunal during thependency of this appeal. 2.In view of this statement, nothing survives in this appeal and the same is disposed of. (A.K. MENON, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.