Case Law › High Court › M/S Jindal Spicy Food Tech Ltd v. Income...

M/S Jindal Spicy Food Tech Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer (Tds)-Ii, Chandigarh And Others

High Court 27 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

27 Mar 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Jindal Spicy Food Tech Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer (Tds)-Ii, Chandigarh And Others, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH CRM-M-5220-2018 (O & M)Date of Decision: 27.03.2019 M/s Jindal Spicy Food Tech Ltd. Versus _.. Petitioners Income-Tax Officer (TDS)-II, Chandigarh and others | ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present:Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate and Mr. Rajshekhar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate forMr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counsel,for the respondents-Income Tax Department. INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file application firstly before the trial Courtfor staying of the proceedings. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that if any such application is filed by thepetitioners, the trial Court shall decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. 27.03.2019parveen kumar (INDERJIT SINGH) JUDGE) Note’ Whether speaking/reasoned: YesWhether reportable!NO

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.