M/S J.k. Prestressing Company v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S J.k. Prestressing Company v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S J.k. Prestressing Company v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the Appellant :Mr.
Decision: As such, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi, also to the present appeal, the same is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.4 of 2018
Date of decision : 19.03.2018
M/s J.K. Prestressing Company
… Appellant
Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
….Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the Appellant :Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice(Oral)
Undisputedly, issues involved in the present appeal already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No.20 of 2015, titled as M/s Stovekraft India V. Commissioner of Income Tax, decided on 28.11.2017.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
…2…
2. As such, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi, also to the present appeal, the same is disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice
March 19, 2018 (KS/Purohit)
(Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue