Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Kalindi Distributors Private Limite...

M/S. Kalindi Distributors Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I

High Court 16 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
M/S. Kalindi Distributors Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
16 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S. Kalindi Distributors Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

16.12.2020 ss W.P.A. 9473 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) , , M/s. Kalindi Distributors Private Limited Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Kolkata & ors. ,, Ms. Manju AgarwalMr. Bajrang Manot … for the petitioner Mr. Tilok Mitra Mr. Sushil Kr. Mishra … for the respondents This is an application under Article 226 of theConstitution of India wherein the writ petitioner isaggrieved by the proceeding being taken under Section127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. I have heard learned Counsel for the appearingparties and the parties have agreed that an opportunity ofhearing should be given to the petitioner to appear beforethe officer concerned, being the Principal Commissionerof Income Tax-I, Kolkata. In light of the above, the Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax-I, Kolkata, is directed to grant an opportunityof hearing to the petitioner/petitioner’s representative onDecember 23, 2020 at 11.30 a.m. and pass a reasonedorder within a period of two weeks. The reasoned order isto be communicated to the petitioner within a period ofone week from the date of passing of such reasoned order. The petitioner is directed to be present on that date.It is made clear that in the event the petitioner is notpresent on that date, the officer concerned shall be atliberty to proceed and pass a reasoned order ex parte. With the above observations, this writ petition isdisposed of. Since no affidavit-in-opposition is called for,allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not tohave been admitted. All parties are to act on website copy of this order. (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan