M/S. Kamal Engg. & Contractors Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
High Court
04 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S. Kamal Engg. & Contractors Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
Date of order
04 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S. Kamal Engg. & Contractors Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 6.The appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR.
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.224/2005
M/s. Kamal Engg. & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
Vs.
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur
DATE OF ORDER ::: 04.01.2017
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Mr. Prakul Khurana for Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar, for the appellant.Mr. Anuroop Singhi, for the respondent.
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has assailed thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby Tribunal hasdismissed the appeal only on the ground of delay of 60days.
2.This court while admitting the matter on 3.1.2006 had
framed following substantial question of law:-
“Whether in the facts and circumstances of thethe case the Learned Tribunal was justified inconfirming the order of Learned CIT(A) refusingto condone the delay of 60 days in filing appealsummarily?”
3.We have heard counsel for the parties.
4.Taking into consideration the Supreme Court decision
in Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors.reported in AIR 1987 SC1353, the delay ought to have beencondoned.
5.Consequently, both the orders of Tribunal and the CIT(A) are quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back
to CIT (A). Parties will appear before the CIT(A) on30.1.2017 and the CIT (A) will decide the same within four
months.
6.The appeal stands disposed of.
(Vinit Kumar Mathur), J. (K.S. Jhaveri), J.
Brijesh37.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.