M/S Kapurthala Northern India Tanneries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar
High Court
02 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Kapurthala Northern India Tanneries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar
Date of order
02 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Kapurthala Northern India Tanneries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITR No. 25 of 1996
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITR No. 25 of 1996
Date of Decision: 2.7.2010
M/s Kapurthala Northern India Tanneries Ltd.
....Petitioner.
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar
...Respondent.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
PRESENT: None.
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1.In this reference, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Amritsar Bench, Amritsar (for short “the Tribunal”) has referred thefollowing questions of law under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) arising out of ITA Nos.370/88, 704/88 and 676/89 for the assessment years 1982-83, 1983-84and 1984-85:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Tribunal is correct in law in sustainingthe additions of Rs.25,408/- & Rs.44,248/- for theassessment year 1982-83, Rs.62,519/- & Rs.41,000/-for the assessment year 1983-84 and the addition ofRs.4,28,915/- for the assessment year 1984-85
-2-
respectively by holding that section 41 (1) of theIncome-tax Act is attracted?”
2.None appears on behalf of the assessee to pursue thereference. Accordingly, the reference is returned unanswered.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
July 2, 2010gbs
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.