Case LawHigh Court › Ms/ Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Industries...

Ms/ Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patiala

High Court 25 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ms/ Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patiala
Date of order
25 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms/ Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patiala, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Issue: (ORAL) In this reference, the following questions of law have been referred:- "1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in upholding the addition of Rs.

Decision: The reference is disposed of in the same terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITR No. 151 of 1998Date of Decision: 25.7.2019 Ms/ Kishan Chand and Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana .......Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patiala .......Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILLHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: - Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. ***** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) In this reference, the following questions of law have been referred:- "1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in upholding the addition of Rs. 4,08,633/- on account of claim of freight and octroi etc. from the State Trading Corporation of India on mercantile basis as against the change in the method of accounting on cash basis adopted by the assessee for this purpose ? 2.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in disallowing Rs. 1,24,991/- out of the payments of interest made to the bank for the alleged interest free advances made to the sister concerns especially when there were no debit balances against the assessee as per the bank records after October, 1984 ?" Both the learned counsel have agreed that these questions are concluded in terms of decision of this Court dated 24.7.2019 passed in ITR No. 224 of 1995. The reference is disposed of in the same terms. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) July 25, 2019JUDGE Gurpreet Whether speaking /reasoned : YesWhether Reportable : No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan