Case LawHigh Court › M/S Kishor Mokha Huf v. Pr. Commissioner...

M/S Kishor Mokha Huf v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Ors

High Court 20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
M/S Kishor Mokha Huf v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Ors
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Kishor Mokha Huf v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: We therefore, dismiss the petition onaccount of delay and laches.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 30wp6789.2024..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 6789 OF 2024 (M/s Kishor Mokha HUF Vs. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur and ors) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr Ram Heda, Advocate for petitioner.Mr. B.N. Mohta, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE &ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED:20-12-2024 Mr. Heda, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat the assessee was not aware of his rights which is thereason for delay of 16 years having been caused for filing thepresent petition, seeking credit of advance tax claimed to havebeen deposited by the petitioner w.e.f. 31.3.2009. Mr. Mohta,the learned counsel for the respondent opposes the petitioncontending that the delay is gross and unexplained. 2.The position regarding delay has been considered by theApex Court inState of MP Vs. Ramkumar Chaudahary (SLPDiary 48336/2024) decided on 29.11.2024 by the Hon’bleApex Court, considering which,we find that this cannot be areason, to condone the delay of 16 years which has occurred infling of the petition. We therefore, dismiss the petition onaccount of delay and laches. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan