M.s. Luxor Educational And Charitable Trust,Rep. By Its Managing Trustee G.swaminathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Income Tax Department
High Court
26 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
M.s. Luxor Educational And Charitable Trust,Rep. By Its Managing Trustee G.swaminathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Income Tax Department
Date of order
26 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-2020
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M.s. Luxor Educational And Charitable Trust,Rep. By Its Managing Trustee G.swaminathan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Income Tax Department, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: This Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above observations.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025andW.M.P.(MD) Nos.18296 & 18298 of 2025
M.s. Luxor Educational and Charitable Trust,Rep. by its Managing Trustee G.Swaminathan. ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Income Tax Department, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
2. The Income Tax Officer,Exemptions Ward, Madurai-625 002. ... Respondents
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned Order passed u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the first respondent in DIN and Order No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024- 25/1074857176(1), dated 22.03.2025 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2019-2020 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequentially, direct the first respondent to
1/4
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025
condone the delay in filing form No.10B pertaining to the Assessment Year 2019-2020.
For petitioner
: Mr.Veerakathiravan Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Kavinprasanth
For respondents: Mr.N.Dilip KumarSenior Standing Counsel *****
ORDER
This Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order
dated 22.03.2025 under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. By the impugned order, the application filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing in Form 10B for availing benefit of the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been denied.
3. It appears that the petitioner has filed an application on 25.01.2021 for condonation of delay of 301 days and a reminder to the application was made on 2/4
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025
17.02.2025. By the impugned order, the application for condonation of delay has been rejected on the ground that it is beyond the period of three years. However, it is noticed that while reckoning the limitation, the respondents have referred the reminder dated 17.02.2025 and that the original date of application filed on 25.01.2021.
4. Considering the same, the impugned order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the first respondent to pass a fresh order taking note of the above dates preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. This Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / No26.08.2025Internet : Yes / Noapd
3/4
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025
C.SARAVANAN, J.
apd
To1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Income Tax Department, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
2. The Income Tax Officer,Exemptions Ward, Madurai-625 002.
W.P.(MD) No. 23283 of 2025
26.08.2025
4/4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.