M/S Madras Gymkhana Club'the Island', Anna Salaichennai-600 002 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Business Circle-Vichennai
High Court
22 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S Madras Gymkhana Club'the Island', Anna Salaichennai-600 002 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Business Circle-Vichennai
Date of order
22 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010, 2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S Madras Gymkhana Club'the Island', Anna Salaichennai-600 002 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Business Circle-Vichennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, these Tax Case (Appeals) are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the questions of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
TC(A) Nos.37 & 39 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.04.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN
TC(A) Nos.37 & 39 of 2016
M/s Madras Gymkhana Club'The Island', Anna SalaiChennai-600 002.PAN:
.. Appellant in both TC(A)s
vs
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Business Circle-VIChennai... Respondent in both TC(A)s
Prayer in TC(A)No.37 of 2016: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, Chennai in ITA No.536/Mds/2013 for the Assessment Year 2009-2010, dated 19.06.2015.
Prayer in TC(A)No.39 of 2016: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, Chennai in ITA No.1964/Mds/2010 for the Assessment Year 2006-2007, dated 19.06.2015.
(In both TC(A)s)For Appellant :Mr.S.Sridhar
For Respondent:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.AND
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is
availing the on-going Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and hence does not pursue these appeals.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, these Tax Case (Appeals) are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the questions of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs.
Index:NoSpeaking OrderNeutral Citation:Yessl
[A.S.M., J] [C.K., J] 22.04.2025
ToThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Business Circle-VIChennai.
TC(A) Nos.37 & 39 of 2016
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.