M/S Mahabir Industries v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Mahabir Industries v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Mahabir Industries v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: As such, present appeal is disposed of, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi, also to the present appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No.63 OF 2017
Date of Decision: December 22, 2017
M/s Mahabir Industries
versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
…Appellant.
…Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. For the Appellant :Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice
Undisputedly, issues involved in the present appeal already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No.20/2015, titled as M/s Stovekraft India v. Commissioner of Income Tax, decided on 28.11.2017.
2. As such, present appeal is disposed of, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi, also to the present appeal.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed
of accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
December 22, 2017(sd)
( Sandeep Sharma ), Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.