M/S. Mahalaxmi Consultancy, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-25(3), Mumbai & Ors
High Court
22 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Mahalaxmi Consultancy, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-25(3), Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
22 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Mahalaxmi Consultancy, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-25(3), Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.We accordingly allow the application.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SHRADDHAKAMLESHTALEKAR
Digitally signed bySHRADDHAKAMLESH TALEKARDate: 2022.06.2419:47:17 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1295 OF 2022
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1779 OF 2022
M/s. Mahalaxmi Consultancy, Mumbai
.. Applicant/Appellant
Vs.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-25(3), Mumbai& Ors.
.... Respondents
****
Mr.Vishnu S. Hadade for applicant/appellant.Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma for respondents.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE : 22[nd] JUNE 2022
PC :
1.We have gone through the Interim Application seekingcondonation of delay of 78 days in preferring the present appeal.
2.We are satisfed with the the reasons mentioned in theapplication, and those urged before us at the time of hearing.
3.We accordingly allow the application. Delay of 78 days iscondoned. The application is accordingly disposed of.
4.Place the Appeal for admission on 3[rd] August 2022.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue