Case LawHigh Court › M/S Mahesh Vegoils Private Limited v. In...

M/S Mahesh Vegoils Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Ward

High Court 24 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
M/S Mahesh Vegoils Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Ward
Date of order
24 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Mahesh Vegoils Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ito Ward, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed ashaving become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17471/2022 M/s Mahesh Vegoils Private Limited, Through Its Director ShriRamesh Chandra Toshniwal, Age 59 Ears, Having Office At 1StFloor, 147-148, Bazar No. 2, Near Vijay Hostel, Bhilwara(Rajasthan) 311001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ito Ward-1, Kawa Khera Chourha,Shashtri Nagar, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) 311001.Shashtri Nagar, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) 311001. 2. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income TaxDepartment, Ncr Building, State Circle, Jaipur (Rajasthan)302005.Department, Ncr Building, State Circle, Jaipur (Rajasthan)302005. 3. Central Board Of Director Taxes, Through Chairperson,Type-7, Bungalow No. 75, New Moti Bagh, New Delhi110021.Type-7, Bungalow No. 75, New Moti Bagh, New Delhi110021. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): Mr. Falgun Buch. For Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Bhandari for Mr. K.K. Bissa. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 24/01/2024 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account ofsubsequent development, whereby, the assessment order hasbeen passed and appeal has been filed by the petitioner, the writpetition has been rendered infructuous. 2.In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed ashaving become infructuous. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 79-arunp/- (ARUN BHANSALI),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan