M/S Meena Gas Agency, Kotputli v. Income Tax Officer, Wd, Behror, District-Alwar (Raj
High Court
30 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S Meena Gas Agency, Kotputli v. Income Tax Officer, Wd, Behror, District-Alwar (Raj
Date of order
30 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Meena Gas Agency, Kotputli v. Income Tax Officer, Wd, Behror, District-Alwar (Raj, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The petition is disposed of with direction that whileproceeding in pursuance to the notice dated 28.05.2019, therespondent shall consider the reply filed by the petitioner.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9816/2019
M/s Meena Gas Agency, Kotputli Through Its Proprietor AshokKumar Meena Son Of Shri Haripal Meena, Aged About 53 Years,Behind Police Station, Kotputli, District-Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Wd, Behror, District-Alwar (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ankit KumarFor Respondent(s): Mr.Anuroop Singhi,
Mr.N.S.Bhati & Mr.Aditya Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
30/04/2024
1.The short grievance raised in this petition is that beforepassing the order in pursuance to the notice dated 28.05.2019issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (forshort ‘the Act’), reply filed by the petitioner should be considered.
2.The petition is disposed of with direction that whileproceeding in pursuance to the notice dated 28.05.2019, therespondent shall consider the reply filed by the petitioner.
3.Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to availremedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the order passedin pursuance to the notice dated 28.05.2019.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.