In M/S. Mehta Rattonsey Exports v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Xvi, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In terms of the request made in the precipe and reiterated before the Court, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1372 OF 2008
M/s. Mehta Rattonsey Exports..Appellant.
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, City-XVI..Respondent.
....
Ms. Preeti Shukla i/b Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
Not on Board. In view of the precipe submitted by the advocate for the Appellant that he has instructions to withdraw the
Appeal, the Appeal has been taken on Board and called out on the request of the learned counsel. In terms of the request made in the precipe and reiterated before the Court, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue