M/S Menezes Fernandes Enterprises v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:22Nd November, 2012
High Court
22 Nov 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S Menezes Fernandes Enterprises v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:22Nd November, 2012
Date of order
22 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Menezes Fernandes Enterprises v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:22Nd November, 2012, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 799 OF 2012INTAX APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2006
M/S MENEZES FERNANDES ENTERPRISES,THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI JOSE NICOLAU MENEZES, VersusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. Raunaq Rao,Advocate for the applicant.
Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.:-
-Coram:A. P. LAVANDE &U. V. BAKRE, JJ.-Date:22nd November, 2012
Heard Mr. R. Rao, learned Counsel for the applicant and Ms. A.Dessai, learned Counsel for the Respondent.
2. By this application the applicant seeks leave to rely upon the fivedocuments mentioned in paragraph 4 of the application.
3. Mr. R. Rao, learned Counsel submits that these documents wereproduced before Assessment Officer. produced before Assessment Officer.
4. Ms. Dessai, learned Counsel for the respondents submits that theapplicant is not entitled to rely upon these documents since they werenot produced while filing of the Appeal. However, Ms. Dessai doesnot dispute the position that these documents were produced beforethe Assessment Officer.
5. In view of the above, we permit the applicant to produce and relyupon the documents mentioned in paragraph 4 of the application.
6. The application is accordingly allowed. The applicant to placeall these documents on record in Tax Appeal no. 13 of 2006 beforethe next date i.e. 04/12/2012.
7. The Application stands disposed of.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
mv
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.