M/S. Mohit Steel Industries v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Dec 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S. Mohit Steel Industries v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Mohit Steel Industries v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 898 OF 2013INSTAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2249 OF 2013
M/S. MOHIT STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the applicant.Ms. A. Dessai, Advocate for the respondent.
-Coram:U. V. BAKRE, J.
-Date:6th December, 2013
P.C. Heard Mr. John for the applicant.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filingRevision Application against the order dated 08/03/2013 passed bythe learned Registrar whereby the registration of Stamp has beenrefused.
3. Upon perusal of the application and upon hearing the learnedCounsel for the applicant, delay is condoned, subject to payment ofcosts of Rs.750/- by the applicant in favour of the State Government. The applicant to deposit the costs within two weeks. Upon deposit ofthe costs, let the Revision Application be registered.
4. The application stands disposed of.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue