Case Law › High Court › M/S Nasib Singh And Sons v. Pr. Commissi...

M/S Nasib Singh And Sons v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana And Others

High Court 20 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

20 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Nasib Singh And Sons v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana And Others, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 26723 of 2015Decided on : 20.01.2016 M/s Nasib Singh and Sons Versus Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana and others . . . Petitioner . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG PRESENT: Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kannan Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India, is for issuing a writ in the nature of Certiorari forquashing the order dated 04.11.2015 (Annexure P-13) vide which, in thepretext of deciding the application for stay filed by the petitioner, in termsof order dated 27.7.2015 of this Court, passed in CWP No. 3859 of 2015,respondent No.1 has decided the main appeal and granted an illusionaryrelief to the petitioner, despite the application for stay having been partlyallowed, the entire amount still stands attached/forfeited by the respondent-Department. 2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitionerstates that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition at thisstage. 3.Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE January 20, 2016 J.Ram (RAJ RAHUL GARG) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.