Case Law › High Court › M/S Navketan Marketing v. Income Tax Off...

M/S Navketan Marketing v. Income Tax Officer Ward 18(2) New Delhi & Ors

High Court 06 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

06 Nov 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Navketan Marketing v. Income Tax Officer Ward 18(2) New Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: At request, present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 11102/2019, CM APPL. 45705/2019 M/S NAVKETAN MARKETING ..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Tani Malik and Mr. Rohit KumarGupta, Advs.Gupta, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 18(2) NEW DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC withMr.Ram Krishan Kumar, Advs. forUOI.Mr.Ram Krishan Kumar, Advs. forUOI. Ms. Laxmi Gurung, Sr. Standingcounsel with Mr.Siddharth Gupta,Adv. for Revenue. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%06.11.2019 CM APPL. 45706/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11102/2019 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition oninstructions from the petitioner. 4. At request, present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 06, 2019Pallavi SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.