M/S Navnet Publications Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income
High Court
30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S Navnet Publications Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Navnet Publications Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly the appeal is allowed by answering aforesaid question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.470 OF 2011
M/s Navnet Publications Ltd. ....Appellant Mumbai
Vs.
The Asstt. Commissioner of Income ....RespondentsTax, Circle 7(1), Mumbai & Anr.
Mr. Ajay R. Singh, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble, , Advocate for respondents.
P.C.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2011.
Though six questions are raised in this appeal, Counsel for the
appellant has not pressed the first five questions. The appeal is admitted on
the sixth question raised by the appellant, which reads thus:
“Whether 90% of foreign exchange fluctuation income should be reduced from the business profits while calculating deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act? ”
2.Counsel for the parties state that the aforesaid question is answered
in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax And
2
ITXAL: 470/2011
Another, reported in [2011] 332 ITR 42 (Bom.). Accordingly the appeal is allowed by answering aforesaid question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The appeal is disposed off. No costs.
( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.