Case LawHigh Court › M/S. New Lakshmi Jewellers v. The Dy. Di...

M/S. New Lakshmi Jewellers v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax (Inv) & Ors

High Court 24 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. New Lakshmi Jewellers v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax (Inv) & Ors
Date of order
24 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. New Lakshmi Jewellers v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax (Inv) & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The Petition is disposed of. [ S.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1202 OF 2019 M/s. New Lakshmi Jewellers ..Petitioner Versus The Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv) & Ors...Respondents ................... Mr. Sushant Murthy a/w Ms. Shyamli Hajela i/by H & M LegalAssociates for the PetitionerMr. Sushant Murthy a/w Ms. Shyamli Hajela i/by H & M LegalAssociates for the Petitioner Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 1Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Fraser Alexander for Respondent No. 5Mr. Fraser Alexander for Respondent No. 5 ................... CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : JUNE 24, 2019. P.C.: 1.The above Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seekingdirections against the respondents to release 7 Kgs. of goldbelonging to the petitioner and seized from Shri. GauravSurana. The petition has also sought further directions notto include the petitioner's stock-in-trade in the assessment ofGaurav Surana. The petitioner has annexed an applicationdated 4.10.2017 made to the Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax - 32 seeking redressal of their grievance. Theyhave stated in the Writ Petition that the Principal Commissioner has failed to decide the application even after23 months. The petitioner has through his Advocate,therefore, prayed for appropriate reliefs. 2.In view of the above, it would be appropriate to issuenecessary directions to the Principal Commissioner of IncomeTax -32 to decide the application filed by the petitioner dated4.10.2017 at the earliest. In the circumstances, the followingorder is passed:- (i) The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 32 is directed to dispose of the application dated4.10.2017 filed by the petitioner and pendingsince the last several months, within a period ofsix weeks from the date of this order. 4.10.2017 filed by the petitioner and pendingsince the last several months, within a period ofsix weeks from the date of this order. (ii) The Principal Commissioner shall give personalhearing to the petitioner if they so desire. hearing to the petitioner if they so desire. 3.All contentions of the parties are kept open. 4.The Petition is disposed of. 4.The Petition is disposed of. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan