Case LawHigh Court › M/S Nobel Share Trading Pvt. Ltd v. The...

M/S Nobel Share Trading Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ludhiana & Ors

High Court 08 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Nobel Share Trading Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ludhiana & Ors
Date of order
08 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Nobel Share Trading Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ludhiana & Ors, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA 58 of2015(O0&M) i | IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Date of Decision:08.01.2021 ITA No.58 of 2015(0&M) M/s Nobel Share Trading Pvt. Ltd Versus The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ludhiana & Ors ...... Appellant ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANT PARKASH Present:-Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for the Appellant, *K JASWANT SINGH, J(QORAL) [The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing sincethe proceedings are being conducted in virtual court) Appellant had filed an appeal under Section 260-A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 19.09.2014 (AnnexureA-7)passed by ITAT, Chandigarh upholding the levy of penalty for allegedlyconcealing income of Rs.42,00,000/- by the appellant for assessment year2002-03. Vide order dated 14.05.2015 the appeal stands|admitted NowCM No.10946FCII of 2020has been filed by the appellant seeking withdrawal of the appeal. It has been given out in the application that theapplicant/appellant does not want to pursue the present appeal as it hasavailed the “Vivad Se Vishwas 2020” Scheme vide order dated 09.12.2020VINAY MAHAJAN2021.01.11 12:20I attest to the accuracy and(AnnexureA-8) attached with the application passed by the Designatedintegrity of this document ITA 58 of2015(O0&M) Authority. Notice of the application. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel accepts noticefor Revenue and does not dispute the averments made in theapplication seeking withdrawal of the appeal. On the oral request of the counsel for the appellant, mainappeal is ordered to be taken up today itself. | For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and main appeal is herebydismissed as withdrawn (JASWANT SINGH )JUDGE January 08, 2021Vinay| Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable (SANT PARKASH ) | JUDGE Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan