Ms Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4 & Anr
High Court
09 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ms Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4 & Anr
Date of order
09 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ms Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4 & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Issue: This more so since we are unaware of whether there are appeals of earlier vintage which may be pending before the said authority.
Decision: 5.The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~49
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 1931/2024
MS NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Ankul Goyal, Mr. Pulkit Pandey, Advs.
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4 & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R% 09.02.2024
1.This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-
“(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Second Respondent to expeditiously dispose of the pending Appeals for AY 2013-14 to 2018-19 on an out of turn/priority basis in a time bound manner;
(b) Pass such other orders which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.”
2.The prayer essentially is for expeditious disposal of appeals for
Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2018-19 which are stated to be pending before the second respondent.
3.In the absence of any material placed before us which may give us an indication of the state of the board of the concerned appellate authority, we find no justification to frame any peremptory direction for out of turn disposal of these appeals. This more so since we are
unaware of whether there are appeals of earlier vintage which may be pending before the said authority.
4.We thus dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the appellate authority shall duly consider the applications for expeditious disposal which have been made and take further proceedings accordingly.
5.The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.FEBRUARY 9, 2024/neha
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.