M/S. Omprakash Shivprakash, Akola v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur
High Court
18 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
M/S. Omprakash Shivprakash, Akola v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur
Date of order
18 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Omprakash Shivprakash, Akola v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Income Tax Reference is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 33 OF 2002
(M/s. Omprakash Shivprakash, Akola vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur)
_____________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. FEBRUARY 18, 2016.
Shri C.J. Thakkar, learned counsel for theapplicant, upon instructions, states that considering thesmallness of tax effect, the assessee is not interested inprosecuting the reference further. He, however, requests forkeeping all contentions of the assessee open.
Shri Parchure with Shri Mohata, learned counselfor the respondent has no objection.
Accordingly, we return the referenceunanswered. However, all contentions of the assessee arekept open for its due evaluation, if occasion therefor arisesin future.
Income Tax Reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.