In M/S. Opera Clothing v. Income Tax Officer 18(1)(3) Mumbai, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Issue: 3.Whether additional substantial question of law should be framed as urged by the appellant or not will be examinedat the admission stage of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 583 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 2017
WITHCHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 584 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 276 OF 2017
M/s. Opera Clothing
.. Applicant
In The Matter Between:
M/s. Opera Clothing
.. Appellant
Vs
Income Tax Officer 18(1)(3) Mumbai.. Respondent
...................
Mr. Bharat Gandhi i/b Swapnil Newaskar for the Applicant
•
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Heard.
2.The prayer for amendment of the respective IncomeTax Appeal is granted. Amendment to be carried out withintwo weeks. Re-verification dispensed with. Amended copy
be supplied to the respondent.
3.Whether additional substantial question of law should
be framed as urged by the appellant or not will be examinedat the admission stage of the appeal.
4.Accordingly, both the Chamber Summons are disposed
of.
[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue