Case Law › High Court › M/S. Outotec (Canada) Ltd. ….Appellant(S...

M/S. Outotec (Canada) Ltd. ….Appellant(S v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax)-2(1) ….Respondent(S

High Court 17 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

17 Aug 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Outotec (Canada) Ltd. ….Appellant(S v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax)-2(1) ….Respondent(S, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to pursue the application before the competent authority.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA(ORIGINAL SIDE) ITA/93/2018 IA NO:GA/2/2020 (Old No:GA/864/2020) (Through Video Conferencing) M/S. OUTOTEC (CANADA) LTD. ….Appellant(s) Through : Mrs. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Advocate V/s DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAX)-2(1) ….Respondent(s) Through : Mr. Debasis Chaudhuri, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, JUDGE O R D E R 1.Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that she has instructions to withdraw the present appeal as the appellant has filed an application for settlementof the disputes under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The application is pendingwith the competent authority. 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to pursue the application before the competent authority. KOLKATA (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ ) (RAJESH BINDAL)17.08.2021 JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)sm/GH

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.