M/S Park Leather Company And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Unit-9, Kolkata And Ors
High Court
03 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S Park Leather Company And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Unit-9, Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
03 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Park Leather Company And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Unit-9, Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD 12
ORDER SHEET
WPO/1461/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
M/S PARK LEATHER COMPANY AND ORS
VSTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL) UNIT-9, KOLKATA ANDORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 3[rd] August, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Sudhakar Thakur, Adv.Mr. Syed Rahil Faraz, Adv.…For the PetitionerMrs. Smita Das De, Adv.…For the respondents
The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the petitioner.
Petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the inactionon the part of the respondent CIT Appellate Authority concerned of theIncome Tax in disposing the appeal of the petitioner on the order of remanddated 31[st] December, 2018 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating toassessment year 2013-14.
A very peculiar stand has been taken by the respondent Income TaxAuthority that though the appeal was filed manually but after the passing ofthe order of the Tribunal remanding the matter before the CIT AppellateAuthority concerned faceless system came into effect and the departmentitself does not know that in such a case who will be the appellate authorityin disposing of the appeal of the assessee petitioner and submitting thatpetitioner himself is to take initiative to find out who will be its appellate
authority under the faceless system. Such stand of the department is highlyunacceptable as to why the assessee petitioner is to be harassed for changein the system of the department. It is the department concerned who willhave to do this task and inform that who is the Appellate Authority.
Considering the submission of Ms. Das De that the appeal of thepetitioner has already been registered online and he will be given intimationin due course, I am not inclined to pass any order.
It is expected that the appeal in question of the petitioner will bedisposed of expeditiously.
Accordingly, this writ petition being WPO 1461 of 2023 standsdisposed of.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
TR/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.