M/S. Payportal Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 19(2

$~47 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 1895/2020 M/S. PAYPORTAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... PetitionerThrough:Mr.SaubhagyaAgarwalandMr.Abhishek Mohan, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19(2) ..... RespondentThrough:Mr.Deepak Anand, Senior StandingCounselwithMr.VipulAgarwal,Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%19.02.2020 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 2. The short grievance in the present writ petition is against the demandnotice issued in pursuance of the assessment order passed the AssessingOfficer (AO), for Rs.3,60,87,171/-. 3. The petitioner has preferred a stay application, before the AO as well asCIT (A) before whom the statutory appeal has been preferred. The grievanceis that neither of the stay applications has been considered and therespondent has proceeded to attach the bank account of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the AO shall dispose of thestay application, moved by the petitioner, within one week from today and till then the amount in the account of the petitioner shall not be appropriated.5. In view of the aforesaid statement, which shall continue to bind therespondent, this petition is accordingly disposed of.6. Dasti. VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 19, 2020v SANJEEV NARULA, J