Case LawHigh Court › M/S P.c.goyal & Co v. The Director Gener...

M/S P.c.goyal & Co v. The Director General Income Tax (Investigation),Chandigarh And Others

High Court 02 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S P.c.goyal & Co v. The Director General Income Tax (Investigation),Chandigarh And Others
Date of order
02 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In M/S P.c.goyal & Co v. The Director General Income Tax (Investigation),Chandigarh And Others, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the statement made by counsel for therespondents, the writ petition is allowed, order dated 30.05.2012 Civil Writ Petition No.23294 of 2012 -2- (Annexure P-27), is set aside and the matter is remitted to theCommissioner of Income Tax, Central, Ludhiana, to decide the matterafter affording...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Civil Writ Petition No.23294 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23294 of 2012 Date of Order: 02.09.2013 M/s P.C.Goyal & co. ...Petitioner Versus The Director General Income Tax (Investigation),Chandigarh and others. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate,for the respondents. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The petitioner's grievance, precisely put, is thatremuneration for special audit has been fixed, in violation of Rule14B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Counsel for the respondents states, on instructions, thatthe matter would be reconsidered after affording complete and fullopportunity to the petitioner to put forth his objections to theproposed payment and, therefore, six weeks' time may be granted tothe Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Ludhiana, to pass a freshorder. In view of the statement made by counsel for therespondents, the writ petition is allowed, order dated 30.05.2012 Civil Writ Petition No.23294 of 2012 -2- (Annexure P-27), is set aside and the matter is remitted to theCommissioner of Income Tax, Central, Ludhiana, to decide the matterafter affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner with respectto remuneration to be paid to the petitioner regarding special audit.The needful be done within six weeks from receipt of a certified copyof this order. Disposed of accordingly. (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE September 02, 2013 nt (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan