M/S Phagwara Improvement Trust v. Ita
High Court
15 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Phagwara Improvement Trust v. Ita
Date of order
15 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S Phagwara Improvement Trust v. Ita, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
M/s Phagwara Improvement Trust.
Versus
ITA No.178 of 2014 (O&M)Date of Decision: 15.12.2014
..... Appellan
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-IJ, Jalandhar and another
.....Respondents
CORAM#HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA
Present:Mr. Davinder Pal Soni, Advocate forMr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents.
TR oS
RAJIVE BHALLA, J (QRAL)
Counsel for the parties agree that in view of judgment
passed in ITA No.24 of 2013 (M/s Amritsar Improvement Trust,
Amritsar Vs. Commuissioner_of Income Tax, Amritsar _aanother0, the appeal has to be allowed and the matter has beremitted to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for adjudicationafresh.
In view of the consensus between the counsel for theparties, the appeal 1s allowed, order dated 23.07.2013 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amrtsar 1s setaside and the matter is restored to the Tribunal for adjudicationafresh.
| RAJIVE BHALLA ||JUDGE
| B.S. WALIA |
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue