Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Pharmaceutical Research Associates...

M/S. Pharmaceutical Research Associates India Pvt. Ltd v. Dated : 6Th January, 2009

High Court 06 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Pharmaceutical Research Associates India Pvt. Ltd v. Dated : 6Th January, 2009
Date of order
06 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Pharmaceutical Research Associates India Pvt. Ltd v. Dated : 6Th January, 2009, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3665 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL LDG. NO.3364 OF 2008 M/s. Pharmaceutical Research Associates India Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax..Range 8)3).Respondent -- S/Shri P.C. Tripathi along with A.K. Jasani the Appellant. Shri Vimal Gupta for the Respondent.-- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. Heard. There is no serious opposition to grant theNotice of Motion. Keeping in view the decision of this Court inOrnate Traders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, dated 29[th]August, 2008 passed in Notice of Motion No.2281 of 2008 in ITAppeal (L) No.1814 of 2008 and the fact that the delay of 43 daysin filing the present appeal has been explained in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, we see no reason as to why thedelay should not be condoned. Consequently, the delay iscondoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a). 2.List the Appeal for hearing on admission before theregular bench after its registration. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan