Case Law › High Court › M/S Piramal Sons Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner...

M/S Piramal Sons Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 14 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M/S Piramal Sons Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Reference No.293 of 1997 M/s Piramal Sons Pvt.Ltd. ..Applicant vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay City IX ..Respondent Mr.Rajesh Shah i/b M/s Rajesh Shah and Co. for applicant. None for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 14th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. Learned Counsel for the applicant says that the applicant is not keen to proceed with the above matter. Hence, reference is returned back unanswered. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.