M/S Pivot Fabrique H.p v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh
High Court
16 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Pivot Fabrique H.p v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh
Date of order
16 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Pivot Fabrique H.p v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
RA-CR-27-2019 in ITA-449-2015 (O&M)Date of Decision : 16.08.2019
M/s Pivot Fabrique H.P.
..... Applicant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JIUSTICAVNEESH JHINGAN
111
Present :Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocatefor the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and|Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocatefor the Revenue.
111
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
For orders see RA-CR-28 of2019 in ITA-240 of2016, Shri Arun
Trehan since deceased through his LRs. Vs. Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax-lI, Chandigarhdecided vide order of even date.
(AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
16.08.2019.pooja sharma-l
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue