M/S Posh Semco Pte Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S Posh Semco Pte Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Posh Semco Pte Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition and the application are disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
22.
+ W.P.(C) 2585/2016 & CM No.10992/2016
M/S POSH SEMCO PTE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Nageswar Rao and Mr Sandeep S. Karhail, Advocates.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
& ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 23.03.2016
1. The challenge in this petition is to several notices dated 27[th] March, 2015
issued to the Petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 followed by notices dated 6[th] May, 2015, 5[th] June, 2015, 26[th] October, 2015 and 15[th] February, 2016 under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act all relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.
2. Having heard the submissions of Mr Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for
the Petitioner and Mr Dileep Shivpuri, learned Senior Standing counsel for the Respondent, the Court is of the view that the Petitioner should pursue the
W.P.(C) 2585/2016 Page 1 of 2
remedy available against the order to be passed by the Assessing Officer pursuant to the reply filed by it in response to the notices issued to it. There is no occasion for this Court, at this stage, to interfere in the matter.
3. All the contentions of the Petitioner are left open to be urged at the appropriate stage.
4. The writ petition and the application are disposed of in the above terms.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MARCH 23, 2016 MK
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
W.P.(C) 2585/2016 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.