M/S Prem Bansal Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Zirakpur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Ludhiana And Another
High Court
12 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Prem Bansal Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Zirakpur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Ludhiana And Another
Date of order
12 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Prem Bansal Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Zirakpur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Ludhiana And Another, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 3,This appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.275 of 2012 (O&M)
-|-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHAN DIGAR
Sr. No. 10"
ITA No.275 of 2012 (O&M)Date of decision: 12.12.2016
M/s Prem Bansal Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Zirakpur
....Appellant
VerSus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Ludhiana and another....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
RRS
Present:-Mrs. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMs. Rinku Dahiya, Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate,for the respondents,
KERR
S.J. VAZIFDAR,CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
CM No27756;CII of 2012
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 143 daysin filing the appeal is condoned subject to all just exceptions,
Main Appeal
This is an appeal against the order of the Tribunal pertaining tothe Assessment Year 2008-09. This appeal is similar to ITA No.273 of 2012which was admitted by an order dated 08.01.2013.
?DThe result in this appeal shall follow the result in ITA No.273
of 2012 which we disposed of by a separate order and judgment passed
ITA No.275 of 2012 (O&M)
today.
3,This appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)CHIEF JUSTICE
December 12, 2016Jyoti I
(DEEPAK SIBAL)JUDGE
(1)Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No(11)Whether reportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue