M/S. Pvalue Analytics Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Office
High Court
27 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S. Pvalue Analytics Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Office
Date of order
27 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Pvalue Analytics Private Limited & Anr v. Income Tax Office, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~40
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.M.C. 1113/2020
M/S. PVALUE ANALYTICS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
..... PetitionersThrough:Mr. Gagan Kumar and Mr. AmitKaushik, Advocates.Kaushik, Advocates.versus
INCOME TAX OFFICE..... RespondentThrough:Mr.DeepakAnand,Sr.StandingCounsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal,Advocate.Through:Mr.DeepakAnand,Sr.StandingCounsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal,Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R%27.02.2020
Crl. M.A. No. 4374/2020 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 1113/2020 and Crl. M.A. No. 4373/2020 (for stay)
This is a petition filed by the petitioners under Section 482Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of complaint case No. 7328/2019.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that hemay be given liberty to approach learned Sessions’ Court for hisgrievances and fifteen day’s time be given within which thepetitioners would prefer a revision petition. He further submits thattill the time revision proceedings are not decided by the SessionCourt, a direction be issued to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate
that trial should not be proceeded.
Let petitioner take steps before the Session Court and theSession Court shall deal with all the contentions with regard to stay ofproceedings before the trial court and the contentions which would beraised in the revision petition as per law as expeditiously as possible.The petitioners are also at liberty to approach this Court as and whenrequired.
A copy of the order be given dasti under the signature of theCourt Master.
FEBRUARY 27, 2020
AK
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.