M/S Radiant Exports & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
11 Apr 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S Radiant Exports & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
11 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Radiant Exports & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
WRIT PETITION NO. 919 OF 2005.
WRIT PETITION NO. 919 OF 2005.
WRIT PETITION NO. 919 OF 2005.
M/s Radiant Exports & anr. ..Petitioner.
vs.
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai-XVI, Mumbai & ors. ..Respondents.
Shri A.R. Singh for the petitioner.
Shri Pankaj Kapoor for the respondent
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
P.C.
1. Heard finally by consent of the parties. Shri
Kapoor waives service on behalf of the respondents.
2. Having considered the impugned order dated
15th June 2004, we find that the Commissioner of
Income-tax, Bombay-XVI failed to take into
consideration the relevant aspect that the petitioner
did receive the sale proceeds from some parties after
some time over which the petitioner had no control.
By overlooking this vital aspect the impugned order is
vitiated.
3. We accordingly, quash and set aside the order
dated 15th March 2004 passed by the Commissioner of
Income-tax, Mumbai-XVI and direct him to pass
appropriate order afresh in consonance with the
provisions of section 80HHC(2) after giving an
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.