M/S. Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Through v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
High Court
16 Jul 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
M/S. Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Through v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
16 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Through v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPT No. 83 of 2024
M/s. Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Through Partner- Anuja Ravindran Wife Of Late Shri M. Ravindran Aged About 52 Years, Partnership Firm, Resident Of ACC Main Gate Jamul Square, Jamul, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from the CIS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16.07.2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalOrder on Board
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, seekspermission of this Court for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to challenge theorder dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P2) before the appropriate forum in accordancewith law.
2.Learned counsel for the respondent not opposed above submission.
3.Accordingly, petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.
4.Certified copies of orders Annexures P1 and P2 shall be returned to thepetitioner after retaining attested true copy of the same.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.