M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11(1) Kolkata And Ors
High Court
09 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11(1) Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
09 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11(1) Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Court :- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal by its order dated 4[th] September, 2024 has directed the petitioner to pay an ad hoc 10% of the outstanding demand i.e., Rs.11,28,00,000/- within a period of one month for granting stay of the assessed dues and dire...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD–9
WPO/922/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
M/s. RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
-VERSUS-
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1) KOLKATA AND ORS.
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date: 9[th] January, 2025.
Appearance : Mr. Deepak Chopra, Adv. Mr. Rohan Khare, Adv. Mr. Indranil Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Subrata Mukherjee, Adv. …for the petitioner. Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ...for the respondents.
The Court :- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal by its order dated 4[th] September, 2024 has directed the petitioner to pay an ad hoc 10% of the outstanding demand i.e., Rs.11,28,00,000/- within a period of one month for granting stay of the assessed dues and directed as under:
“Therefore, the Stay Petition is allowed subject to the following conditions:
i) The assessee shall pay 10% of the outstanding demand (i.e. Rs.11.28 Crores) within a period of one month.
ii)Subject to the payment of the demand as at (i), the rest of the demand shall be stayed for a period of 180 days or till the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier.
iii) No adjournment shall be sought by the assessee in the appeal before the Tribunal unless it is absolutely necessary on account of any exigency or unavoidable circumstances.”
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent authorities submits that there is a huge income tax due and the Tribunal has rightly given a direction for only 10% of the outstanding demand for stay of the assessed dues.
Heard learned counsels for the parties. As huge income tax dues are pending, learned Tribunal is requested to consider the appeal of the petitioner before it without insisting on 10% of the outstanding demand and hear and dispose of the appeal within 31[st] March, 2025.
costs.
Accordingly, WPO/922/2024 is disposed of without any order as to
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
A/s.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.