M/S. R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi & Ano
High Court
10 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
M/S. R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi & Ano
Date of order
10 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S. R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi & Ano, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 6 of 2013
M/s. R.M.Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi & Ano.
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
------
For the Appellant/Petitioner : M/s.Birendra Kumar, Niraj Kishore For the Respondents : Mr.D.Roshan
------
Order No.10
th December,2013
Dated 17
The petitioner is represented by learned counsel, Mr.Birendra
Kumar and the respondent-Revenue by learned counsel, Mr.D.Roshan.
This application is filed for restoration of cross-appeal filed by the assessee-petitioner in T.A No.36/2000, which was dismissed on 31.10.2012 both for non-prosecution as well as in view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No.40/2000.
From perusal, it is seen that Tax Appeal No.40/2000 preferred by the Revenue was decided on merit on 31.10.2012 and while the same (T.A No.40/2000) being decided, T.A No.36/2000 filed by the assessee-petitioner was dismissed both for non-prosecution as well as in view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No.40/2000.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue submitted that this application could be heard by the perusal of the order dated 31.10.2012 passed in T.A No.40/2000.
Registry is directed to list this matter after two weeks along with the records of T.A No.40/2000.
(R.Banumathi, C.J.)
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
dey
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.