Case LawHigh Court › M/S. S. Hati v. Income Tax Officer, Ward...

M/S. S. Hati v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Hooghly & Anr

High Court 22 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S. S. Hati v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Hooghly & Anr
Date of order
22 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S. S. Hati v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Hooghly & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal (ITA/138/2018) is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA/138/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE M/s. S. HATI -VERSUS- INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), HOOGHLY & ANR. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 22[nd] May, 2024. Appearance:Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. … for the appellant. Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv. ...for the respondent. 1.Heard Sri Ananda Sen, learned counsel for the appellant/assessee and Ms. Smita Das De, learned senior standing counsel assisted by Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learned junior standing counsel for the respondent/revenue. 2.This appeal was admitted by this Court by order dated 20.07.2018 on the following substantial question of law : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the assessee, not having challenged the order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 had forfeited its right to challenge the fresh assessment order passed on the basis of direction of the revisional authority ?” 3.Learned counsel for the appellant, on instruction, submits that the matter has been settled by the appellant/assessee under Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020 and, as such, the appeal has become infructuous. He also produces a copy of the Form-3 i.e., the certificate under sub-Section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 read with Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2020, which is kept on record. been settled by the appellant/assessee under Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020 and, as such, the appeal has become infructuous. He also produces a copy of the Form-3 i.e., the certificate under sub-Section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 read with Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2020, which is kept on record. 4.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal (ITA/138/2018) is disposed of. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) As.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan