M/S Sagar Enterprises v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla
High Court
09 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Sagar Enterprises v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla
Date of order
09 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Sagar Enterprises v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.As such, present appeal is disposed of, making thedirections in M/s Stovekrat India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi,also to the present appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.46 of 2018
Decided on: 09.07.2018
M/s Sagar Enterprises
…Appellant.
Versus
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla
…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief JusticeThe Hon’ble Mr.Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, JudgeWhether approved for reporting? For the appellant: Mr.Rakesh Thakur, Advocate.For the respondent:Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, withMr.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice(Oral)
Undisputedly, issues involved in the present appeal
already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No.20/2015, titled asM/s Stovekraft India vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, decided on28.11.2017.
2.As such, present appeal is disposed of, making thedirections in M/s Stovekrat India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandi,also to the present appeal.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
July 9, 2018
( vt )
( Ajay Mohan Goel )Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue